My Car Was Repossessed Three Years After I Reaffirmed it in a Chapter 7 – What are My Options?

26 Sep My Car Was Repossessed Three Years After I Reaffirmed it in a Chapter 7 – What are My Options?

The bankruptcy law limits how often you can file a second case. A lot has been written about so called “serial filers” – property owners who file multiple Chapter 13 cases to thwart foreclosures, but what about debtors who successfully complete their Chapter 13 or who receive a discharge in a Chapter 7 but find themselves in trouble a few years later.

This morning, I received the following email from a potential client:

I filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy in October 2005, and ow my car has been repossessed. What are my options because I owe $17,000 and I know they wont get that for the car when it is sold at the auction.

The short answer is that you cannot file another Chapter 7 for eight (8) years from the date you filed your Chapter 7 – in this case sometime in October, 2013. You cannot file a Chapter 13 and receive a discharge for four (4) years from the date of filing your Chapter 7 – in this case, October, 2009.

You could file a Chapter 13 for the purpose of paying back some or all of the repossession deficiency but you would not be eligible for a discharge.

What can we learn from this situation:

  • be very careful about reaffirming debts in Chapter 7. In this case, the debtor reaffirmed a vehicle loan but end up not being able to pay the debt. I think that far too often debtors reaffirm debts in Chapter 7 without thinking through the implications. When you reaffirm a debt in Chapter 7, it becomes, in essence, a non-dischargeable debt. In my view if you can come out of your Chapter 7 with no debt and no installment obligations. You are far better off saving up your money to buy an inexpensive vehicle for cash.
  • although a Chapter 13 would still be available, it most likely does not make any economic sense. Chapter 13 has become so complicated that most attorneys charge between $2,500 and $5,000 for Chapter 13 cases. If this debtor ends up owing $10,000, it clearly does not make sense to pay $2,500 for the right to pay that $10,000 over five years in a Chapter 13.
  • Most likely the best option for this individual is to try to work out a payment plan or subject his/her wages to garnishment. In my view, his/her situation is not one that is solvable by bankruptcy.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
The following two tabs change content below.

Jonathan Ginsberg, Esq.

I represent individuals in Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 cases filed in the Northern District of Georgia, which includes Atlanta, Newnan, Gainesville and Rome. I publish several informative web sites, including https://www.atlanta-bankruptcy.com and an Atlanta bankruptcy blog, https://www.thebklawyer.com/thebkblog. Please mention Bankruptcy Law Network when you call.
No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.