How Does the 3rd Circuit Determine FDCPA Violations

02 Sep How Does the 3rd Circuit Determine FDCPA Violations

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, found at 15 U.S.C. 1692, addresses abusive debt collection practices. It is a remedial statute passed by Congress in 1977 to prevent deception in the process. Courts interpreting this law apply a standard of whether the communication would deceive or mislead the least sophisticated debtor. This is an objectively low standard that protects all consumers, the shrewd and the most gullible, from deceptive collection practices.

To reach a decision, the Court determines whether a debt collection letter can be reasonably read by that least sophisticated debtor to have two or more different meanings, one of which is inaccurate.

The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals visited this issue in Rosenau v. Unifund, and decided two issues: one issue relating to false representation or implication that a letter is from an attorney, in violation of 1692e(3), that I discuss in Debt Collection Letter May Not Falsely Imply it is from Lawyer; and another issue under 1692e(10) prohibiting any false representation or deceptive means to collect a debt, that I discuss in A Legal Department Without Lawyers.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
The following two tabs change content below.

Andy Miofsky, Esq.

Andy Miofsky holds the highest AV PREEMINENT rating from Martindale Hubbell Law Directory and a perfect 10.0 from AVVO. Andy is an Illinois consumer rights lawyer with offices in Granite City Illinois. Andy represents people with bankruptcy and student loan debt problems throughout the Southern District of Illinois since 1979.
No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.