02 Sep Chapter 13 Lien Stripping: Effective At Confirmation
Most legal professionals are of the opinion that a chapter 13 mortgage lien strip should not be effective until discharge or plan completion. They take this position, even though there is no such authority for the same anywhere in the code.
The better position, is that lien strips of wholly unsecured mortgages should take place immediately. This is primarily due to the language of 506(d) which states “To the extent that a lien secures a claim against the debtor that is not an allowed secured claim, such lien is void.” Indeed, 506(d) contains no reference whatsoever to plan completion or discharge. Likewise, 506(a) valuations also contain no reference to plan completion or discharge.
While creditors might argue that immediate removal of a mortgage prior to plan completion or discharge might allow a debtor to “play the system” and eliminate a mortgage and immediately dismiss or convert the case to chapter 7, such an argument is flawed in light of 11 USC 348 and 11 USC 349. These provisions provide that dismissal or conversion reinstates any previous lien voided under 506(d). Accordingly, the creditor is still protected.
Recently, a local Chapter 13 Trustee brought forth very same argument in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California. The Chapter 13 Trustee argued in moving papers that the“order stripping junior deed of trust must recite that it is subject to successful completion of chapter 13 plan.”
“Trustee’s objection re: effective date of lien strip is not well taken. Millspaugh (at p. 103) is well- reasoned and persuasive on the issue of the effective date of the lien strip–the date of plan confirmation.”
Accordingly, at least in the Southern District of California, it appears that mortgage lien stripping may take place well before plan completion and discharge.
Written by Michael G. Doan
See a recent study recommending lien-stripping as another tool in the arsenal to prevent home mortgage foreclosure.
Latest posts by Craig W. Andresen, Esq. (see all)
- Judicial Estoppel: Medical Malpractice Claim Survives Omission From Bankruptcy Schedule A/B - January 27, 2019
- Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1: An Unlikely New Weapon Against Debtors - January 9, 2017
- Court Says Chapter 7 Debtor May Not Have Two Cases Pending at Same Time - December 12, 2016
- Unsettled Question: Another Court Rules That Bankruptcy Client Worksheets Are Privileged - February 6, 2016
- Chapter 13 Debtor’s Lawsuit Tossed Out for Failure to List It in Bankruptcy Documents - January 31, 2016