In light of the recent news that Sallie Mae, America’s largest student loan provider, fraudulently provides monetary incentives to schools pushing their student loans, it makes one wonder why loans from this company, and other student loan companies are (a) guaranteed by the U.S. Government, (b) given extraordinary collection powers and (c) are virtually non-dischargeable in bankruptcy. Nowhere have I found a decent explanation.
At first blush, it seems obvious. Higher education is expensive, and young borrowers would not otherwise have the established credit to borrow the funds necessary to go to college. Lending to this group would certainly never occur without guarantees backed by the U.S. Government. Really? Have you been to a college campus lately? Like the cigarette industry marketing to minors, credit card companies set up carnival booths and give away merchandise in exchange for filling out a credit application. They practically beg to lend young students money. By the way, Citibank, who is also bribing institutions to hawk their student loans, provides student loans guaranteed by the government and totally unsecured credit cards to the same collegiate borrowers. So why is the guarantee necessary?
What would happen if the U.S. government stopped guaranteeing student loans? Would people stop going to college and graduate school? Would there be a shortage of doctors? A likely result is that young people would scrutinize the absurd cost of many institutions, and said institutions would actually lower the cost of education to compete.
Student loans are too easy to get, and too difficult to get rid of. By virtue of section 484A(a) of the Higher Education Act, there is NO limit to how long the U.S. Department of Education, or the guaranty agency, can collect, sue, or enforce judgments a borrower in default. That means forever. They can garnish wages without suing the borrower. They can collect credit card-like interest, penalties and collection fees. They can take a borrower’s federal income tax refund. They can even take Social Security payments, both retirement and disability. Wow!
In bankruptcy, discharging a student loan is extremely difficult, as pointed out in Andy Miofsky’s article. Given all the protections afforded to lenders who turn educators into pimps, it makes no sense why discharge should be so difficult. As usual, the burden falls back on the middle class, who are too poor to pay for college but too rich for financial aid.
Latest posts by Chip Parker, Esq. (see all)
- Bankruptcy as an Asset Protection Tool – Part 2 - October 19, 2013
- Bankruptcy as an Asset Protection Tool – Part 1 - October 18, 2013
- The New Rules For Getting An FHA Mortgage After Bankruptcy - August 30, 2013
- 11th Circuit: Debtor’s Tax Refund Exempt as Tenants by the Entireties Property - August 15, 2013
- Why does Bankruptcy Court have the highest mortgage modification success rate? - June 15, 2013
Last modified: May 7, 2014