13 Jan Divorcing Couple with a Mountain of Debt
An all-to-common picture of American domestic dysfunction: a married couple whose marriage cannot be retrieved from the abyss of discord, who trudge into the office of a bankruptcy lawyer to discuss their mountainous load of unsecured credit card debt. As expected, the husband has the lion’s share of the debts in his name, but the wife has significant debts too. He earns a good salary for his family, while the wife works part time near their home.
The couple makes clear their marriage is over, and they are actively seeking to hire divorce lawyers. Should they file bankruptcy now, or wait until the divorce is finished? Should they file chapter 7 or chapter 13? And can the bankruptcy lawyer even begin to advise two people whose legal interests may no longer be aligned, and who will be involved in a possibly bitter divorce battle?
The answer to the latter question often is yes, as long as the couple can tolerate sitting in the same room together for awhile, and as long as both husband and wife perceive that because of their children, both parties still have, and will continue to have, a stake in each other’s financial well being.
The bankruptcy lawyer will need to explain that because he or she has a duty of loyalty to each party, the lawyer cannot give any legal advice about the impending divorce. The lawyer’s advice will need to be limited to the couple’s rights against their creditors. Happily, this is the one subject where the two parties’ legal interests are aligned. The wife might wonder if she can avoid bankruptcy altogether by waiting to see if the family court will award her a hefty child support and alimony package, which might allow her to continue paying her debts. While this might be within the realm of possibility, it could involve substantial sacrifice at a time when there are few financial resources to spare. Most divorcing families experience a significant drop in standard of living, due to the higher cost of maintaining two separate households. However, if the debt load is relieved through bankruptcy prior to a divorce, there are more financial resources to be shared between the parties, rather than diverting those resources to unsecured creditors.
Additionally, the wife has little interest in seeing her soon-to-be ex-husband impoverished after a divorce. It’s in her interest to preserve his paycheck from the unsecured creditors too: after all, her children will be spending alot of time with him, and it’s better for her if she doesn’t have to drop the children off at a low-rent hovel every weekend. This means each party has important reasons to address the debt load in a bankruptcy proceeding, before the divorce is commenced.
Finally, chapter 7 is the appropriate choice for most divorcing couples, rather than a years-long chapter 13 repayment case. It’s probably asking too much from most divorcing couples to maintain a substantial financial enterprise together in the form of a chapter 13.
Latest posts by Craig Andresen, Minneapolis, MN, Bankruptcy Attorney (see all)
- Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1: An Unlikely New Weapon Against Debtors - January 9, 2017
- Court Says Chapter 7 Debtor May Not Have Two Cases Pending at Same Time - December 12, 2016
- Unsettled Question: Another Court Rules That Bankruptcy Client Worksheets Are Privileged - February 6, 2016
- Chapter 13 Debtor’s Lawsuit Tossed Out for Failure to List It in Bankruptcy Documents - January 31, 2016
- U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Chapter 7 Junior Mortgage “Lien Strip” Case - March 22, 2015