14 Feb Means Test: Don’t Give Up, Even If You Think You’ve Flunked It, Part 12
Line 32 of Form B22A (the means test form for chapter 7), and Line 37 of Form B22C (the means test form for chapter 13), reads as follows:
Other Necessary Expenses: telecommunications services. Enter the total average monthly amount that you actually pay for telecommunications services other than your basic home telephone and cell phone service — such as pagers, call waiting, caller ID, special long distance, or internet service — to the extent necessary for your health and welfare or that of your dependents. Do not include any amount previously deducted.
Be sure you have included the items listed above as expenses on your means test form, unless you cannot say the items are necessary for your health and welfare.
For many persons, an extra home phone land line, an extra cell phone, a pager, caller ID, and internet service, are necessary for health and welfare, if you are paying for those items. If you have teenagers using the telephone, or a home based business, an extra phone line might be needed. A pager could be needed for the same reasons. Caller ID and call waiting are viewed by most persons as necessary for health and welfare. Internet service is necessary if you have school age children, and it is necessary for most persons for recreation, communication, and possibly employment.
Cable TV is certainly a telecommunications expense. After all, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 dealt largely with an overhaul of the federal regulation of cable TV. Due the huge diversity of programming available on cable TV, is should not be hard to establish that some of that is necessary for your health and welfare, especially if you have school age children or special employment needs.
As long as you can provide good reasons that you or your dependents need the listed telecommunications expenses, these expenses should be allowed. Claiming each and every possible expense on the means test form is important, and should produce a more favorable result in your bankruptcy case.
Latest posts by Craig Andresen, Minneapolis, MN, Bankruptcy Attorney (see all)
- Bankruptcy Rule 3002.1: An Unlikely New Weapon Against Debtors - January 9, 2017
- Court Says Chapter 7 Debtor May Not Have Two Cases Pending at Same Time - December 12, 2016
- Unsettled Question: Another Court Rules That Bankruptcy Client Worksheets Are Privileged - February 6, 2016
- Chapter 13 Debtor’s Lawsuit Tossed Out for Failure to List It in Bankruptcy Documents - January 31, 2016
- U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Chapter 7 Junior Mortgage “Lien Strip” Case - March 22, 2015