If you are in a chapter 13 case, you might eventually receive an ominous-looking document entitled “Motion for Relief From Stay,” or some similar caption. This multi-page document is filed by a secured creditor, such as your mortgage lender or car loan finance company, when it wants to obtain bankruptcy court permission to foreclose or repossess the collateral.
This is obviously a serious matter, bordering on disaster, for persons who need their chapter 13 case to pay off their mortgage back payments or vehicle loan. A lift stay motion is usually filed against you if you have fallen behind on house payments, or chapter 13 payments, or car payments if you are required to make them, during your chapter 13 case.
However, all need not be lost if you receive a lift stay motion. With the help of your bankruptcy lawyer, you can file a response to a lift stay motion, and ask for a hearing before the bankruptcy court judge.
The judge will usually deny the motion to lift the stay if you can catch up on the payments you have missed by the time of the hearing. You can even ask for extra time to catch up on payments, and the judge may allow this if your request is reasonable.
Often, the judge will require that you pay the bank’s attorneys fees incurred in bringing the lift stay motion, as a condition of denying the motion. This commonly results in an additional $250 to $750 for you to pay, which is certainly a negative result if your finances are already precarious. Additionally, your bankruptcy lawyer will usually charge a fee for helping you defend the lift stay motion.
If you receive a lift stay motion, the first to do is talk to your lawyer about defending against the motion. This may be a good time to re-evaluate your chapter 13 plan. You may even want to consider allowing the motion to be granted, and giving up the property at issue, especially if you can no longer afford to keep it.
Latest posts by Craig Andresen, Minneapolis, MN, Bankruptcy Attorney (see all)
- After-Acquired Property in Chapter 13: Whether to Amend the Schedules is No Longer in Doubt - November 29, 2013
- Brunner: Vicious, Stupid, and Stubborn - October 20, 2013
- Attorney-Client Privilege Doesn’t Apply in Chapter 7, Florida Bankruptcy Court Rules - September 30, 2013
- Health Savings Accounts Not Exempt in Bankruptcy - September 4, 2013
- 7th Circuit Splashes Cold Water on Chapter 7 “Lien Stripping” Hopes - July 14, 2013
Last modified: February 13, 2008