22 Jun Debtors Can Lose The Lease In Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. Why?
My colleague, Kurt O’Keefe, of Michigan, recently wrote regarding the difference between reaffirming a lease and reaffirming a secured loan on a vehicle. He stated throughout his article that a lease was a different type of animal — neither secured or unsecured and a lease can be assumed or rejected. His final point was that assumption of a lease did not mean that a debtor was again personally liable on the debt (the opposite of what would happen in a secured loan situation). However, there is more to the issue.
Whena Chapter 7 bankruptcy is filed, one of the forms filed with the court is a Statement ofIntention. That Statement tells creditors what the the intention is regardingleased property and secured debts.Since 2005 and the adoption of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act, chapter 7 debtors are limited to three choices: (1) surrendering the item that secures the debt or lease (2) redemption of the secured item by paying the creditor the market value of the item or (3) reaffirmation of the debt, meaning that the debtor agrees to pay the debt and the creditor can pursue the debtor after bankruptcy if the debtor fails to follow through with the payments (and also repossess the secured item, usually cars). The Statement of Intention indicates whether the debtor is willing to assumeor wants to reject. However, it is not up to the debtor whetherthe contract continues in a Chapter 7. The decision belongs to the Trustee and the Creditor according to a recent Oregon Bankruptcy Court decision.
In 2010, chapter 7 bankruptcydebtors in Oregon, brought a lawsuit following their discharge against Ford Motor Credit. FordMotor Credit repossessed their leased automobile following discharge and while the debtors were current with payments. The debtors, Michael and Jamie Smith, hadreceived a reaffirmation agreement fromFord Motor Credit, which the Smiths filled out andreturned to Ford. However, the reaffirmation agreement was never filed with the Court. The Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee specifically declined to assume the contracton behalf of the debtors’ estate. The defendant, Ford, brought a motion to dismiss. The Court granted the motion and summarized its decision:
Smith v. FMCC, 10-6091-fra, In re Smith, 09-64658-fra7 (Oregon, 9/13/10).
ï»¿In the Smith case, the vehicle was not mentioned on the personal property schedule (Schedule B); the lease was properly mentioned on the lease/executory contract schedule (Schedule G). However, on the Statement of Intention, no mention of the lease or the vehicle was on the Smith form.
ï»¿The Court found that the debtors had not complied with the 45-day requirement and that 11 USC Section 365(d) provides that the trustee may assume or reject the lease. If the trustee rejects the lease, then at the lessor’s option, the lease may be assumed. If the creditor doesn’t want to allow the assumption, then the creditor can resort to state law breach of contract remedies and repossess the vehicle (even if, as in the Smith case, the debtors were current on the lease payments). The court then dismissed the complaint as there had been no violation of the bankruptcy code by Ford Motor Credit.
Chapter 7 Debtors beware!! A Creditor may decide that aleased vehicle is valuable enough that the Creditor will not allow assumptionof a lease by debtors.
Latest posts by Karen Oakes, Esq. (see all)
- Bankruptcy Attorney Named by Trump as Ambassador to Israel - December 23, 2016
- Truth or Consequences: The Department of Justice in Bankruptcy Court (updated for 2016) - March 5, 2016
- Honesty? Is Honesty Honestly The Best Policy In Bankruptcy? - January 22, 2016
- How to Discharge Your Student Loans In Bankruptcy! Yes, It Can Be Done! - July 25, 2015
- The People Who File For Bankruptcy: What Kind of People Get Rid of Their Debts? - January 22, 2014