<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bankruptcy Law Network &#187; Michael G. Doan, San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/author/michaeldoan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com</link>
	<description>Real Lawyers, Real Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:48:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What does a Chapter 7 Flowchart Look Like?</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/11/08/what-does-a-chapter-7-flowchart-look-like/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/11/08/what-does-a-chapter-7-flowchart-look-like/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael G. Doan, San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bankruptcy Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/?p=10647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are thousands of bankruptcy attorneys out there throughout the United States practicing bankruptcy law. While each may run his or her practice a little differently than the others, they are all still bound by the same federal laws found under Title 11 of the US Code.  Accordingly, each chapter 7 case is more or [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/11/08/what-does-a-chapter-7-flowchart-look-like/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy and Security Clearances</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/11/04/bankruptcy-and-security-clearances/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/11/04/bankruptcy-and-security-clearances/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 03:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael G. Doan, San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bankruptcy Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life After Bankruptcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/?p=10586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what happens to your security clearance if you file for bankruptcy protection?  Is it revoked? Will you be terminated from your job?  Will you be demoted?  Does your salary decrease?
While there are bankruptcy code provisions that regulate the public and private sector over discriminations in employment when one files for bankruptcy protection, most employers [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/11/04/bankruptcy-and-security-clearances/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Attorney Fees Still Recoverable in the 9th for Stay Violations?</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/26/are-attorney-fees-still-recoverable-in-the-9th-despite-for-stay-violations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/26/are-attorney-fees-still-recoverable-in-the-9th-despite-for-stay-violations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael G. Doan, San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automatic Stay In Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Cases & Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 11 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bankruptcy Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/?p=10290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 1, 2009, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Sternberg v. Johnston, No. 07-16870 wherein it affirmed a stay violation under 11 USC 362, yet held that attorney fees were only recoverable related to enforcing the automatic stay and remedying the stay violation, and not in the litigation of damages.  In [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/26/are-attorney-fees-still-recoverable-in-the-9th-despite-for-stay-violations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Unfavorable Bankruptcy Means Test Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/20/another-unfavorable-decision-in-the-ninth-bap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/20/another-unfavorable-decision-in-the-ninth-bap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael G. Doan, San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Cases & Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bankruptcy Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/?p=10176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently I posted a Blog on the unfavorable In re Martinez decision recently handed down by the Ninth Circuit BAP on October 5, 2009.  Well, the Ninth Circuit BAP did it again that same day in another case with a slightly different twist in the Smith matter.
The BAP essentially issued almost the same opinion, but applied [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/20/another-unfavorable-decision-in-the-ninth-bap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bankruptcy Means Test: Unfavorable Decision in Ninth BAP</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/19/bankruptcy-means-test-unfavorable-decision-in-the-ninth-bap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/19/bankruptcy-means-test-unfavorable-decision-in-the-ninth-bap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael G. Doan, San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Cases & Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bankruptcy Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/?p=10121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On October 5th, 2009, the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) published its decision in In re Martinez, wherein it concluded that debtors who strip junior liens off mortgages are not entitled to deduct those payments from the chapter 13 projected disposable income test.  While the decision was ordered published, the 3 judge panel disagreed with each [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/19/bankruptcy-means-test-unfavorable-decision-in-the-ninth-bap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Happens if You Don&#8217;t Object to Bankruptcy Claim?</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/15/what-happens-if-you-fail-to-object-to-claim-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/15/what-happens-if-you-fail-to-object-to-claim-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael G. Doan, San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Cases & Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bankruptcy Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/?p=10060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If a creditor files a proof of claim in a Bankruptcy Proceeding, it is deemed allowed unless you or another interested party objects.  So what does &#8220;allowed&#8221; mean and what are its ramifications?
An allowed claim can have significant repercussions.  To start, if there are dividends that will be paid in the bankruptcy proceeding to creditors, it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/15/what-happens-if-you-fail-to-object-to-claim-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disclosure of Assets and Supplying Due Diligence Documentation in Bankruptcy</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/11/disclosure-of-assets-and-supplying-due-diligence-documentation-in-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/11/disclosure-of-assets-and-supplying-due-diligence-documentation-in-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 23:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael G. Doan, San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bankruptcy Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Bankruptcy Attorney & You]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/?p=9969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Filing for Bankruptcy is no walk in the park.  It is an extensive process, with significant document gathering and processing, in addition to research, disclosures, and sometimes multiple court and trustee hearings.  Nevertheless, the more work done up front, the smoother the process will be.  One such area involves compiling all the due diligence documents [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/10/11/disclosure-of-assets-and-supplying-due-diligence-documentation-in-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Refunds: Bankruptcy Attorney Fees</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/09/26/refunds-bankruptcy-attorney-fees/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/09/26/refunds-bankruptcy-attorney-fees/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael G. Doan, San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 13 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bankruptcy Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Your Bankruptcy Attorney & You]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/?p=9583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not uncommon for a debtor to have second thoughts about filing for bankruptcy relief, terminate attorney services prior to filing, and request a refund.  There are many reasons debtors change their mind, such as being persuaded by others that bankruptcy is not in their best interest, finding a cheaper price by less experienced [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/09/26/refunds-bankruptcy-attorney-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strategic Bankruptcy?</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/09/22/strategic-bankruptcy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/09/22/strategic-bankruptcy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael G. Doan, San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benefits of Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bankruptcy Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life After Bankruptcy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/?p=9416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More and more often these days, we are hearing about &#8220;Strategic Foreclosure Defaults&#8221; in the housing market.  Such defaults occur typically when a borrower with perfect credit and ability to afford the mortgage, makes the intentional financial decision to let a home foreclose back to the lender.
Such defaults are generally triggered by massive amounts of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/09/22/strategic-bankruptcy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ninth Circuit Eliminates &#8220;Ride Thru&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/09/16/ninth-circuit-eliminates-ride-thru/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/09/16/ninth-circuit-eliminates-ride-thru/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael G. Doan, San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Cases & Legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy Practice and Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chapter 7 Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Bankruptcy Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/?p=9340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On September 15, 2009, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its ruling in Dumont with a split 2 to 1 decision, holding that &#8220;Ride Thru&#8221; is no longer an option in the Ninth Circuit as a result of the new Bankruptcy Laws enacted under BAPCPA.  In doing so, it overturned its previous Parker decision, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/09/16/ninth-circuit-eliminates-ride-thru/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
