<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Civil Judgments For Past Due Debts &#8211; Why Do I Care?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/05/20/civil-judgments-for-past-due-debts-why-do-i-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/05/20/civil-judgments-for-past-due-debts-why-do-i-care/</link>
	<description>Real Lawyers, Real Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:34:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lawsuits and the bankruptcy discharge &#124; on the Bankruptcy Soapbox</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/05/20/civil-judgments-for-past-due-debts-why-do-i-care/comment-page-1/#comment-35359</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawsuits and the bankruptcy discharge &#124; on the Bankruptcy Soapbox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/?p=7206#comment-35359</guid>
		<description>[...] that judgment remains just as dischargeable as it was before the case was filed.  And apparently differently from New York, a judgment in California does not automatically become a lien on the defendant&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that judgment remains just as dischargeable as it was before the case was filed.  And apparently differently from New York, a judgment in California does not automatically become a lien on the defendant&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
