<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Remove That Mortgage Entirely:  Yes, We Can</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/01/08/remove-that-mortgage-entirely-yes-we-can/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/01/08/remove-that-mortgage-entirely-yes-we-can/</link>
	<description>Real Lawyers, Real Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:34:06 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Here&#8217;s Who Supports Lifting the Ban on Judicial Modification of Home Mortgages, part 2 : Mortgage Law Network</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2009/01/08/remove-that-mortgage-entirely-yes-we-can/comment-page-1/#comment-34312</link>
		<dc:creator>Here&#8217;s Who Supports Lifting the Ban on Judicial Modification of Home Mortgages, part 2 : Mortgage Law Network</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/?p=5604#comment-34312</guid>
		<description>[...] introduced HR 225, which is similar to S.61 except that it limits the remedy to existing loans and restricts the remedy for defective loan documents to mortgages violating TILA and not other consumer protection [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] introduced HR 225, which is similar to S.61 except that it limits the remedy to existing loans and restricts the remedy for defective loan documents to mortgages violating TILA and not other consumer protection [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
