Click Here To Receive FREE Email Updates!

Current ArticleMain Content RSS FeedSubscribe

Massachusetts Decision Addressing Controversial Means Testing Issues

Massachusetts Bankruptcy Judge Feeney recently decided in re Mati, 2008 WL 2389234 (Bkrtcy.D.Mass.2008), a case addressing two important means testing issues for above-median income Chapter 13 debtors. This case is one of many now revealing how substantial the changes are to Chapter 13 practice after BAPCPA. Many of these changes are only now emerging after almost three years have passed since the 2005 amendments. I will deal with the first point of the decision in this post.

The Mati Court examined whether the debtor could exclude his 401(k) contributions from his disposable income in formulating his Chapter 13 plan payment. The Court put it this way: “The Court finds that the Debtor’s 401(k) contributions do not evidence bad faith under the totality of the circumstances in this case. The Debtor is merely taking advantage of what the law allows. Indeed, by excluding 401(k) contributions from property of the estate and expressly removing them from the definition of disposable income under section 1325(b), see 11 U.S.C. ยง 541(b)(7), Congress has implemented a policy of protecting and encouraging retirement savings.” Mati at 5.

The Court appropriately applied the plain language of the statute which excluded the retirement contributions from disposable income. However, I think that the quoted language is key for another reason: it recognizes that doing what the law allows is not bad faith. Some cases have implied that courts would attempt to use “bad faith” to do an end-run around the statute when its terms benefited debtors in permitting a result that was seen as inequitable or at odds with pre-amendment practice. Mati lends support to the contention that one is not acting in bad faith if they are doing no more or less than the law allows.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Home Loan Servicers Harvest A Bumper Crop In Bankruptcy by Kent Anderson, Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney

Same Sex Marriages and Bankruptcy by L. Jed Berliner, Massachusetts Bankruptcy Attorney

More Americans choosing bankruptcy over poverty by Chip Parker, Jacksonville Bankruptcy Attorney

Get In Touch With A Lawyer Near You

Why are you considering bankruptcy?

Garnishment
Creditor Harassment
Repossession
Foreclosure
Lawsuits
Illness/Disability
Divorce
Other:

What kind of bill problems do you have?

Credit Cards / Store Cards
Personal Loans
Child Support
Student Loans
Car Loans
Income Taxes
Payday Loans
Medical/Dental/Hospital Bills
Past Due Mortgage Bills
Other:

Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship with any lawyer, nor does it constitute an agreement by any lawyer to perform any service – including consult with you in any way. Some lawyers may charge a fee for a consultation concerning your situation. We will never sell your personal information.



Want even MORE information delivered to you - for FREE?
Just fill out this form to subscribe to Network News!

Your Name:
Email Address:
State You Live In:

Trackback URL

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.