<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $650,000 in Sanctions Imposed in Bankruptcy Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2008/05/04/650000-in-sanctions-imposed-in-bankruptcy-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2008/05/04/650000-in-sanctions-imposed-in-bankruptcy-case/</link>
	<description>Real Lawyers, Real Solutions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:25:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Docket &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bankruptcy judge’s sanctions against law firm upheld</title>
		<link>http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2008/05/04/650000-in-sanctions-imposed-in-bankruptcy-case/comment-page-1/#comment-35412</link>
		<dc:creator>The Docket &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bankruptcy judge’s sanctions against law firm upheld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bankruptcylawnetwork.com/2008/05/04/650000-in-sanctions-imposed-in-bankruptcy-case/#comment-35412</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] month, I wrote about Rosenthal’s sanctions because they had stirred up quite a buzz in the legal community. According to many lawyers watching the case, Rosenthal was unfairly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
