Highway Use Taxes in Bankruptcy
By Kent Anderson, Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney on Oct 18, 2007 in Bankruptcy Cases of Interest, Discharge, What Can and Cannot Be Forgiven, General Bankruptcy Information, Oregon, Tax Issues
And just when you think that things are a-turnin’ round,
You get a thousand board feet weighin’ twenty thousand pound
Weigh station’s open – Just your rotten luck,
There goes the next payment on your used log truck.
If the finance company repossesses the log truck, will the hapless owner-operator in this ballad be pursued to the grave by nondischargeable highway taxes? Not necessarily, but a review of some relevant cases suggests that timing and other factors will be an issue.Claims for highway use taxes levied against truckers based on mileage driven and the weights of vehicles and their cargo turn up all too frequently in Oregon bankruptcy cases. A recent Missouri case (In re Trism, Inc. et. al., 311 B.R. 509, 8th Cir BAP, 2004) concerning the priority of a federal claim against a trucking firm cited an older Oregon Bankruptcy case (In re Clifford H. Dawson and Linda M. Dawson, 98 B.R. 519, 1989) in which the court determined an Oregon State claim against a log truck operator to be nondischargeable.
The 8th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel cited the older Oregon decision in determining whether Federal charges of $305,872.64 for operating overweight vehicles on national highways were an excise tax or a fee. In ruling for the IRS, the Appellate Court used In re Dawson as a basis for classifying a highway use fee as an excise tax.
In the Oregon case, the Dawsons had filed an adversary proceeding against the Oregon Department of Transportation claiming that Oregon State Highway taxes were fees, and therefore eligable for discharge in bankruptcy. The court ruled that they were excise taxes. This alone did not make them nondischargeable. Under §523(a)1, highway use fees classified as excise taxes are nondischargeable only if they were incurred within three years of the date of filing, or no return was filed, or the return contained willful misrepresentations designed to evade the payment of taxes. Taxes assessed against the Dawsons were incurred within three years of filing and therefore were excluded from discharge.
If you liked that post, then try these...
Is Private School Tuition An Allowable Deduction Under The Means Test? by Karen Oakes, Southern Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney
Chapter 13 Wage Garnishment Is Not Required By Bankruptcy Law by Susanne Robicsek, North Carolina Bankruptcy Attorney
My Husband (or Wife) is Filing a Bankruptcy…How Will It Affect My Real Property – Chapter 13 by Peter Orville, Attorney at Law
My Lawyer is a Debt Relief Agent! by Eugene S. Melchionne, Connecticut Bankruptcy Attorney
Bankruptcy Basics: Why Object To Claims Filed In A Chapter 13 Case? by Karen Oakes, Southern Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney
You must be logged in to post a comment.