Debt Collector Calls to Payroll Departments and What is Reasonably Necessary to Effectuate a Postjudgment Judicial Remedy
By Nicholas Ortiz, Boston Bankruptcy Attorney on Oct 8, 2007 in Consumer Protection, Debt Collector Abuses
As I previously wrote, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (”FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. 1692c(b), only allows a debt collector to contact third parties in very limited circumstances. One of these circumstances is when the contact is reasonably necessary to effectuate a postjudgment judicial remedy. A debt collector may erroneously believe that calling someone’s payroll department is permitted under this exception. Debt collectors sometimes threaten to make calls to payroll departments to scare consumers. However, this third party contact would not be permitted under the FDCPA because it is not reasonably necessary to effectuate a postjudgment judicial remedy. If a debt collector obtains a judgment against a consumer, it may seek garnishment if allowed under the laws of the state. However, effectuating a garnishment does not require verbal communication with an employer. So a threat to “call” someone’s payroll department is always a threat to do something that is prohibited by 15 U.S.C. 1692c. Therefore, such a threat violates another section of the FDCPA, 15 U.S.C. 1692e.
If you liked that post, then try these...
New Bankruptcy Trustee for Kansas, Oklahoma and New Mexico by Jill Michaux, Kansas Bankruptcy Attorney
Juvenile Restitution Discharged in Chapter 13 Appeals Court Rules by Jill Michaux, Kansas Bankruptcy Attorney
You must be logged in to post a comment.