Shortly after passage of new Code Section 522(c)(1), word spread that trustees could possibly take exempt property to settle domestic support obligations. This section included language that exemptions did not protect property against such debt. Trustees suggested an onslaught against the support obligor in bankruptcy court, ignoring the absence of enabling legislation or authorization to collect fees for such effort.
Judge Mary P. Gorman opined on the issue in In re Vandeventer, Jr. There the Central District of Illinois chapter 7 trustee attempted to administer otherwise exempt property for the benefit of a domestic support obligation creditor. Judge Gorman ruled that changes to the bankruptcy code did not convert exempt property into property of the bankruptcy estate. Likewise, she found no authority for the trustee to administer exempt property in satisfaction of support obligations. This decision follows in line with In re Covington from the Eastern District of California, In re Ruppel from Oregon, and In re Quezada from the Southern District of Florida. There are no reported decisions to the contrary.
No related posts.
You must log in to post a comment.