Judge Somma Holds that Claim by Mortgage Lender for Post-Petition Legal Fees Barred by Laches
By Nicholas Ortiz, Boston Bankruptcy Attorney on Jan 29, 2007 in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
In a significant local opinion, Judge Somma held in the case of In re Sanders, 2007 WL 188676 (Bankr.D.Mass., Jan 23, 2007)(NO. 00-11842-RS) that a mortgage lender’s claim for post-petition fees was barred by laches. Laches is an equitable doctrine that bars a party from asserting a right when he has delayed too long and this delay hurts others. In the Sanders case, the bankruptcy debtor fully satisfied the obligations under her confirmed Chapter 13 plan, including curing her pre-petition mortgage arrears. Ms. Sanders’ attorney brought a motion to declare the mortgage current and the mortgage lender objected based on fees it claimed had accrued during the case. However, the mortgage lender was not able to consistently state the amount of its purported claim (which the Judge called “ever-morphing”). More significantly, however, for future cases, the Judge held that the mortgage lender’s failure to raise its claim for almost four years was unreasonable. The reasoning of this case offers a remedy to the common problem of a debtor emerging from a Chapter 13 plan with burdensome, new mortgage arrears (based on post-petition charges) despite having satisfied all the requirements of their Chapter 13 plan.
powered by performancing firefox
If you liked that post, then try these...
Means Test: Don't Give Up, Even If You Think You've Flunked It, Part 1 by Craig Andresen, Attorney at Law
How long do I save my Bankruptcy papers? by Eugene S. Melchionne, Connecticut Bankruptcy Attorney
Can I Surrender an Expensive Car in My Chapter 13 - What Will Happen? by Jonathan Ginsberg, Atlanta Bankruptcy Attorney
You must be logged in to post a comment.