Main Content RSS FeedFeature Article

In re Draisey: 707(b) Motions Governed By Thirty Day Deadline, Minnesota Bankruptcy Court Says »

Yet another bankruptcy court has issued a ruling recognizing what should have been obvious all along: the U.S. Trustee must file its “ten day statement” regarding supposed abuse of chapter 7 as a prerequisite to any 707(b) motion, whether the motion is based upon the means test (707(b)(2)) or the “totality of the circumstances” (707(b)(3)).  What’s more, any 707(b) motion must be filed within thirty days of the filing of the ten day statement, rather than within sixty days as Interim Bankruptcy Rule 1017 provides.  See In re Draisey, 2008 WL 943721 (Bky.D.Minn. April 8, 2008) (Kishel, J.).

For the court, the decision was easy: section 704(b) of the bankruptcy code requires that a ten day statement be filed as a prerequisite to any 707(b) motion.  The court rejected the argument that the ten day statement was required only for 707(b)(2) means test dismissal motions.  More importantly, the court found that Interim Rule 1017, which establishes a sixty day deadline for 707(b) motions, contravened the plain language of section 704 of the bankruptcy code, which sets a thirty day deadline from the filing of the ten day statement for 707(b) motions.  Because the bankruptcy code takes precedence over the bankruptcy rules, the rule allowing sixty days was invalid and had to be ignored. 

This case reaffirms that bankruptcy courts will follow the code over the rules where they are in conflict, and that the courts will enforce deadlines strictly in 707(b) litigation.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Garnishments in Missouri (Part Two) by Bankruptcy Attorney

Bankruptcy in Florida: Who is the United States Trustee? by Carmen Dellutri, Attorney at Law

Is Bankruptcy Going To Be On My Credit Report? by Karen Oakes, Southern Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney

How Should I Treat My Bankruptcy Lawyer? by Peter Orville, Attorney at Law

My Husband (or Wife) is Filing a Bankruptcy…How Will It Affect Me? by Peter Orville, Attorney at Law

Popularity: 2% [?]

Main Content RSS FeedRecent Articles

Who Are The Trustees In Your Neighborhood, Part VII »

If you are in the Western District of Missouri, Kansas City Division, there are 10 Chapter 7 Trustees. You can never choose the trustee for your case, they are assigned by the Court at the time of filing. So far we have introduced you to Mr. David Stover, Ms. Erlene Krigel, Ms. Janice Stanton and Mr. Gary Barnes, and Mr. Enslein.

Now, let me introduce you to Mr. Bruce Strauss is a partner in the Kansas City law firm of Merrick, Baker & Strauss, P.C. He is currently the only trustee for the Platte County area Chapter 7 cases. In addtion to handling his duties as a Chapter 7 Trustee, Mr. Strauss represents both debtors and creditors in in Chapter 7, 13 and 11 cases.

US Trustee private trustee locater for the Western District of Missouri is here.

Click here for Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV. Part V., VI.

Written by Rachel Lynn Foley.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Bankruptcy Basics: What Is A Reaffirmation Agreement? by Karen Oakes, Southern Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney

The Death Penalty for Bankruptcy Fraud by Brett Weiss, Maryland Bankruptcy Attorney

Creditors Calling After You Filed For Bankruptcy? Don't Get Mad, Fight Back!! by Karen Oakes, Southern Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney

What Should I Expect At The Trustee Hearing? by Eugene S. Melchionne, Connecticut Bankruptcy Attorney

Chapter 7 and House Mortgage: Reaffirmation of a Current Mortgage in Illinois by Andy Miofsky, Illinois Bankruptcy Attorney

Popularity: 2% [?]

Case Invoking Doctrine of Marshaling »

In re Szwyd, 2008 WL 1766591 (Bkrtcy.D.Mass. 2008), the Massachusetts Bankruptcy Court rejected the position of the IRS that it could not be required to marshal assets to satisfy tax liens for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate. Marshaling is a rarely invoked doctrine that, as the Court noted, “rests
upon the principle that a creditor having two funds to satisfy his debt, may not by his application of them to his demand, defeat another creditor, who may resort to only one of the funds.”

The debtor in this Chapter 7 case had a homestead of sufficient value to satisfy his outstanding federal tax liens. The bankruptcy trustee had already sold another property of the debtor and had proceeds on hand, but they were insufficient to cover the tax liens.

The debtor’s homestead was effective against the bankruptcy estate, but not against the IRS. If the IRS did not sell the homestead and instead waited to take its distribution from the bankruptcy estate, unsecured creditors would have ended up with nothing.

Since a Massachusetts homestead was ineffective against the tax liability, the trustee contended that the IRS should be forced to marshal assets by looking first to the homestead. Again, the homestead was effective against the bankruptcy estate and therefore could not be reached by the trustee.

The Court agreed with the trustee that the IRS could be compelled to proceed first against the homestead so that the bankruptcy estate (and the return to unsecured creditors) could be maximized.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Mortgage Assistance or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy? by Susanne Robicsek, North Carolina Bankruptcy Attorney

Think Twice Before Changing Title to Property by Cathy Moran, California bankruptcy lawyer

Loss Mitigation and Avoiding Foreclosure by L. Jed Berliner, Springfield Bankruptcy Attorney

Can Bankruptcy Affect My Right to Receive Social Security Disability Benefits? by Jonathan Ginsberg, Atlanta Bankruptcy Attorney

Bankruptcy Basics: What is a Priority Debt? by Karen Oakes, Southern Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney

Popularity: 4% [?]

Keeping Some Credit Cards Through Bankruptcy »

When you file for Bankruptcy, what do you do if you want to keep some credit cards?  Hide them from your attorney?  NO!  Such “Bankruptcy Fraud” is not worth 5 years in jail and/or 1/2 million dollar fine!  Instead, it depends.   Read the rest

If you liked that post, then try these...

The 2005 Bankruptcy Act: Bankruptcy Filings Are Increasing by Karen Oakes, Southern Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney

When Do I Know Its Right To File For Bankruptcy? 5 Top Reasons. Part II of II. by Michael Doan

Popularity: 12% [?]

When Can I File Bankruptcy Again? »

There is no limit on the number of bankruptcy cases that one may file. In fact, there is no limit in between time frames to file bankruptcy. Nevertheless, if sufficient time between filings does not take place, you may be not be eligible for “discharge.” Read the rest

If you liked that post, then try these...

When Do I Know Its Right To File For Bankruptcy? 5 Top Reasons. Part II of II. by Michael Doan

The 2005 Bankruptcy Act: Bankruptcy Filings Are Increasing by Karen Oakes, Southern Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney

Popularity: 10% [?]

$650,000 in Sanctions Imposed in Bankruptcy Case »

Massachusetts Bankruptcy Judge Rosenthal recently imposed $650,000 in sanctions under Bankruptcy Rule 9011 on various parties for misrepresenting the ownership of a mortgage loan in a bankruptcy case.

Ameriquest Mortgage Company, which was sanctioned $250,000, represented to the Court on various occasions that it was the holder of of the debtor’s mortgage/note. In reality, Ameriquest was only the servicer of the loan for a time.

Two law firms, Ablitt & Charlton, P.C. ($25,000) and Buchalter Nemer Fields & Younger ($100,000), and one lawyer, Attorney Robert Charlton ($25,000) were also sanctioned. Wells Fargo was sanctioned in the amount of $250,000. The order arose in the long-running Nosek case. An appeal will likely follow.

If you liked that post, then try these...

Five Years is a Long Time for Rice and Beans by Jonathan Ginsberg, Atlanta Bankruptcy Attorney

Involuntary Bankruptcy and the Credit Counseling Conundrum by Brett Weiss, Maryland Bankruptcy Attorney

Bankruptcy in Florida: Preparing for the initial consultation? by Carmen Dellutri, Attorney at Law

Unsettled Provisions of BAPCPA - Don't Become a Test Case! by Jonathan Ginsberg, Atlanta Bankruptcy Attorney

Washington Post Says We Are Headed Towards A Boom In Bankruptcy Filings by Susanne Robicsek, North Carolina Bankruptcy Attorney

Popularity: 8% [?]

Federal Reserve Proposes New Rules to Limit Arbitrary Powers of Credit Card Issuers »

On May 2, 2008, the Federal Reserve released a series of proposed rules that would restrict current practices of the credit card industry. Specifically:

  • Banks would be prohibited from increasing the rate on a pre-existing credit card balance (except under limited circumstances) and must allow the consumer to pay off that balance over a reasonable period of time.
  • Banks would be prohibited from applying payments in excess of the minimum in a manner that maximizes interest charges.
  • Banks would be required to give consumers the full benefit of discounted promotional rates on credit cards by applying payments in excess of the minimum to any higher-rate balances first, and by providing a grace period for purchases where the consumer is otherwise eligible.
  • Banks would be prohibited from imposing interest charges using the “two-cycle” method, which computes interest on balances on days in billing cycles preceding the most recent billing cycle.
  • Banks would be required to provide consumers a reasonable amount of time to make payments.

Consumers may review these proposed regulations and submit comments on the Federal Reserve web site. I encourage all readers of this blog to leave a comment supporting these new rules. Read the rest

If you liked that post, then try these...

Juvenile Restitution Discharged in Chapter 13 Appeals Court Rules by Jill Michaux, Kansas Bankruptcy Attorney

New Bankruptcy Trustee for Kansas, Oklahoma and New Mexico by Jill Michaux, Kansas Bankruptcy Attorney

Popularity: 7% [?]

One in 56 Tennessee Households Filed for Bankruptcy »

One in 56 Tennessee households and one in 60 Georgia households filed for bankruptcy relief in the first quarter of 2008*, according to statistics recently released by the National Bankruptcy Research Center.

The national average was one personal bankruptcy per 119.1 households. Here is a list of the top 10 states for bankruptcy filings per household:

  1. Tennessee: 55.8
  2. Georgia: 60.1
  3. Nevada: 61.2
  4. Alabama: 72.1
  5. Indiana: 75.9
  6. Michigan: 76.6
  7. Arkansas: 84.0
  8. Kentucky: 84.2
  9. Ohio: 90.8
  10. Mississippi: 91.8

* Rates adjusted to annual terms.

Source: National Bankruptcy Research Center (nbkrc.com).

If you liked that post, then try these...

What Does The Mortgage Meltdown Mean To Bankruptcy Clients? by Carmen Dellutri, Attorney at Law

What If I Am Being Sued, But I Have To Wait To File My Bankruptcy? by Craig Andresen, Attorney at Law

Central District Illinois Court Dashes Trustee’s Child Support Collection Hopes by Andy Miofsky, Illinois Bankruptcy Attorney

What Is Zombie Debt and Why Is It a Problem? by Kent Anderson, Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney

Bankruptcy and Student Loans: One Frustrating True Story (Part 1) by Douglas Jacobs, California Bankruptcy Attorney

Popularity: 8% [?]

Tangled Webs of Copper Meet in Bankruptcy Court »

Bankruptcy courts stage some of the most complicated and exotic dramas imaginable. Have you heard the one about the Mexican mining company that is being sued by its own subsidiary while simultaneously trying to buy it back? It’s a tale that could only be told in bankruptcy court.

The story begins in 1999 when Grupo Mexico bought an American mining company, Asarco. There is apparently some irony in this because, the Wall Street Journal advises, Grupo Mexico’s core holdings in Sonora, Mexico, were once Asarco’s. At any rate, one of Asarco’s gems was a controlling stake in Southern Peru Copper. In 2004, Grupo Mexico moved the Peruvian interests to another subsidiary.

Unfortunately, within a year, Asarco ended up in bankruptcy. American bankruptcy courts have a funny way of second-guessing company owners sometimes. In 2005, the bankruptcy court appointed an independent board to manage Asarco for the benefit of creditors. Read the rest

If you liked that post, then try these...

Protection from Unfair Mortgage Fees After Chapter 13 by L. Jed Berliner, Springfield Bankruptcy Attorney

Hiring a Bankruptcy Attorney in Florida! Part I by Carmen Dellutri, Attorney at Law

Beware of Misleading Bankruptcy Information From Non-Lawyers by Bankruptcy Attorney

Bankruptcy Basics: What Does It Mean If My Case Is Discharged? by Karen Oakes, Southern Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney

Beware Of Advice From Non-Attorneys: What Are The Choices For Secured Debts In Bankruptcy? by Karen Oakes, Southern Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney

Popularity: 9% [?]

Five Year Plan a Must For Small Business in 9th Circuit »

The 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel recently held that a Chapter 13 debtor engaged in business can not deduct necessary business expenses from gross receipts in determining current monthly income.  In re Wiegand, decided April 3, 2008, all but guarantees that small business chapter 13 debtors will be required to spend five years in a Chapter 13 plan.

Despite the terms of the official form B22C created by the courts for use in evaluating Chapter 13 debtors, the clear language of §1325(b)(2)(B) does not permit the subtraction of ordinary and necessary business expenses from the gross receipts of a small business debtor when calculating Current Monthly Income pursuant to §101(10A).  Read the rest

If you liked that post, then try these...

"Technically" Is A Word That Can Cause A Lot Of Trouble In Bankruptcy by Susanne Robicsek, North Carolina Bankruptcy Attorney

Asset Values and Bankruptcy, Part 1 by L. Jed Berliner, Springfield Bankruptcy Attorney

Washington Post Says We Are Headed Towards A Boom In Bankruptcy Filings by Susanne Robicsek, North Carolina Bankruptcy Attorney

What are the Rights and Responsibilites of Chapter 13 Debtors and Their Attorneys Before The Case is Filed? by Peter Orville, Attorney at Law

Bankruptcy Basics: What Is An Adversary Proceeding? by Karen Oakes, Southern Oregon Bankruptcy Attorney

Popularity: 13% [?]